Disposed
Mr Subrat Wadhawan v. Hdfc Bank
DRTSA/848/2023
What the court decided
AI extract
Outcome
Disposed
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
¶1
DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL LUCKNOW
¶2
| Date of order or lroceedin! |
Orderwithsignatureofcourt | Officeaction takenwithdate |
|---|---|---|
| S.A.No. 848/2023 12.12.2025 SINo.40 |
None appearedfortheapplicant. Mr. K.A. Dhruv, Ld. Counselfor therespondent-bankispresent. Ld. Counsel for therespondent- banksubmitsthat account hasbeen settled Submissionistakenon record. Accordingly, SA being infructuous is disposedof. |
|
| Let thefilebeconsignedto recordroom. Order be uploaded on the Tribunal’swebsite (Dictated) (Pravas Kunl,Singh) PresidingOfficer (Veeresh) |
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- other
Debts Recovery Tribunal Lucknow
- respondent
Respondent-Bank
- applicant
Applicant
Coram
AI extract
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court