Hdfc Bank v. Mohd. Yasir
Case brief
What is this about?
HDFC Bank applied for recovery of dues totaling Rs. 53,00,046.25 with interest against two defendants who defaulted on a commercial equipment loan. The defendants failed to appear; the Tribunal verified admissible evidence and the claim's validity.
What did the court decide?
Recovery Certificate issued for Rs. 53,00,046.25 plus 10% interest; defendants directed to pay dues within two months; assets barred from disposal.
What the court decided
DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL LUCKNOW
| Date oforderor proceeding |
I Order withsignatureof court | Officeaction takenwith date |
|---|---|---|
| O.A.No.925/2024 12.12.2025 |
The Judgment is signed and pronounced on separate sheets. Separately attachedin06 sheets. Order be uploaded on the Tribunal’s website. |
|
| (Dictated) (PravasKumar„,rrgh) Presiding Officer |
||
| (Mugish) |
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL AT LUCKNOW
Present: Pravas Kumar Singh, Presiding Officer
Case No. Original Application No.925 of 2024
Dated: 12.12.2025
HDFC Bank Limited, having Branch at 2nd Floor, Experio Building Vibhuti I<hand, Gomti Nagar, Lucknow – 226010, U.P. ........Applicant-bank
- Versus
- Mohd. Yasir S/o Mohd. Ateek, Add: Ward No.10, Kasai Mohalla Nagar Panchayat, Mahona, Ahmedpur, Khera, Lucknow 227205, Uttar Pradesh.
- Mohd. Atiq S/o Mohd. Siddiq, Add: Ward No.10, Kasai Mlohalla Nagar Panchayat, Mahona, Ahmedpur, Khera, Lucknow – ......Defendants 227205, Uttar Pradesh.
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the bank is legally entitled to the claimed amount as per documents and pleading submitted on an ex-parte basis.
Whether the claim is within limitation and supported by banker's books of evidence.
Parties & counsel
- applicant
HDFC Bank Limited
- respondent
Mohd. Yasir
- respondent
Mohd. Atiq
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court