The Debts Recovery Tribunal, Lucknow, dismissed a review application filed under Section 22(2)(g) of the Recovery of Debts and Bankruptcy Act, 1993, holding that it lacked merit and did not fall within the scope of review under Rule 5-A of the DRT Procedural Rules, 1993.
Review Application No. 18 of 2023 dismissed being devoid of any merit.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
I
2
R. A.No. 18 of 2023
V/ -
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL, AT LUCKNOW
Present: Pravas Kumar Singh, Presiding Officer
Review Application No.18 of 2023
Dated 12.12.2025
Versus
Ld. Counsel for the Applicant: Mr. Shatrughan Upadhyay, Advocate Ld. Counsel for the Respondent-bank: None
JUDGMENT
2
R.A. No.18 of 2023
I
3
R.A. No.18 of 2023
4P
unless it is accompanied by an afpdavit verifying the application.
File be consigned to record room.
[Pravas Kumar- Slgh] Presiding Officer Debts Recovery Tribunal, Lucknow
Judgment signed, sealed, dated and pronounced in the open court on this 12th Day of December, 2025. . K n ~~FF
[Pravas Kumar Singh] Presiding Officer Debts Recovery Tribunal, Lucknow
(Mugish)
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the review application falls within the scope of Rule 5-A of the Debts Recovery Tribunal (Procedural) Rules, 1993.
Whether the impugned order in MA No. 141 of 2022 can be reviewed on grounds of limitation and lack of fair hearing.
M/s Vidhata Rice Mill Sitapur & Smt. Sunaina Devi & Ram Narain Trivedi & Abhishek Trivedi
Indian Bank (Allahabad Bank)
Pravas Kumar Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
