The Deben Recovery Tribunal at Lucknow dismissed Senior Application No. 787/2025 as withdrawn after the applicant sought withdrawal with a liberty to approach the proper forum later, despite objections from respondents regarding lack of mutual consent.
Senior Application dismissed as withdrawn by the applicant with liberty to take proper recourse.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL LUCKNOW
| Date of order or lroceedin! |
Order withsignatureof court | Officeaction takenwithdate |
|---|---|---|
| S.A.No.787/2025 06.10.2025 SI No.47 |
Mr. Anand Kumar Srivastava,Ld. Counsel for the applicant is present. Mr. Vinay Kant Shukla, Ld. Counsel fortherespondent-bankispresent. Mr. VaibhavTiwari,Ld. Counselfor therespondent no.2ispresent. Ld.Counselfortheapplicantis moving IA No.3424/2025 for withdrawal of the SA. It is submitted thatapplicant wants towithdrawthe present SAwith liberty totakeproper recourse. Ld. Counsels for therespondent- bank andrespondentno.2submitsthat in para no.4 of the IA, it is mentioned that SA is beingwithdrawnbymutual consent of the parties. It is further submittedthat any consent has notbeen given by the respondents. Inviewoffact that since applicantis withdrawingthe SA, the SA is dismissed as withdrawn. Applicantwill be atlibertytotake recourseinaccordancewithlaw. Let the file be consigned torecord room. Order beuploadedon theTribunal’s website. (Dictate-<br>( (Pravas Kurhe,,-Singh) PresidingOfficer Veeresh |
Debtors
Applicant's Counsel
Bank
Respondent No.2
Pravas Singh Kurhe
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
