The application was disposed of as infructuous on the ground that the account in question had been settled. No substantial legal principle or proposition of law was discussed.
The SA was disposed of being infructuous as the account has been settled.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL LUCKNOW
| Dateof orderor lroceedin! |
Order withsignatureofcourt | Officeaction takenwithdate |
|---|---|---|
| SA.No.563/2022 06.10.2025 SI No.26 |
None appeared forthe applicant. Mr. Sandeep Kumar Bajpai,Ld. Counselfor therespondent-FIis present. Ld. Counselfortherespondent-FI submits that account in question has beensettled. In view of fact, the present SAis disposed of being infructuous. |
|
| Let thefilebeconsignedto recordroom Order be uploaded on the Tribunal’swebsite (Dictated) q (PravasKumt_ _ingh) PresidingOfficer (Veeresh) |
Debts Recovery Tribunal Lucknow
Respondent-FI
Pravash Kumar Singh
Veeresh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
