Dismissed
M S Eirene v. Bank of India
DRTSA/477/2024
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Appeal dismissed for default as no one appeared for the applicant who was directed to take proper steps with no avail.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL LUCKNOW
¶2
| Date oforder or lroceedinj |
Order withsignatureofcourt | Officeaction takenwithdate |
|---|---|---|
| S.A.No.477/2024 06.10.2025 SlNo.44 |
None appearedfortheapplicant. Ms. Megha Pandey, Ld.Counsel for therespondent-bankispresent. I findthatapplicantwasdirected to takepropersteps, but, of noavail. In view of fact, the present SAis dismissedfordefault. |
|
| Let thefilebeconsignedto recordroom. Order be uploaded on the Tribunal’swebsite. (Dictated) |
¶3
(Pravas Kuma lngh) Presiding aBner (Veeresh)
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- applicant
Debts Recovery Tribunal Lucknow
- respondent
Respondent-Bank
Coram
AI extract
Pravas Kumar Singh
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court