Debt Recovery Tribunal allowed an interim application for withdrawal based on an amicable settlement between the applicant and the opposite party.
Instant I.A. allowed and disposed of as withdrawn and settled amicably; main appeals disposed of as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Debts Recovery Tribunal-3, Kolkata Order Sheet (Continuation)
Case No. SA/62Ol2O24
Pinku Sarkar
Vs.
Aadhar Housing Finance Ltd.
Date of Order Order with signature
Order No.09 Present:
Dt,29.10.2025
Sl. No.23
For Applicant : Ld. Counsel A. Roy Chowdhury
For Defendant : Ld. Counsel Somnath Roy
lA/4192/25 is taken up for hearing.
Heard Ld. Counsels for both sides.
Considered.
Ld Counsel for the Applicant fited I.A. No. 4192 of 2025 prayang
ss for withdrawal of the the matter has been main S.A. During settled with the the Respondent pendency F.L of the and S.A.the
Respondent F.I. is not going to contanue with the instant
proceeding. Since this is an amicable setuement between the
parties and the Applicant intends to withdraw the main S.A., no
prejudice will be caused if the I.A. is allowed. Accordingly. the
instant I.A. is allowed and stands disposed of as withdrawn and
settled amicably. I.A. No. 4191 of 2025 being the put up
petition is also disposed of.
S.A. No. 620 of 2024 along with all other pending I.A.s, if any,
is disposed of as withdrawn.
File be consigned to Record Room after observing all formalities.
( Kamal De )
Presiding Officer
DRT-3, Kolkata
Pinku Sarkar
Kamal De
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
