Allowed the withdrawal of the application in S.A. No. 93/2023 due to an amicable settlement between the parties, where the respondent debtor was not appearing.
The main S.A. is disposed of as withdrawn and settled amicably.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Debts Recovery Tribunal-3,Kolkata Order Sheet (Continuation)
| CaseNo.SA/93 | SriDilip KumarDeY& Anr' Vs. Edelweissasset ReconstruclionCo.Ltd. 0/2O23 |
& A-!rj |
|---|---|---|
| Dateoforder | Orderwithsignature | Signatu16of |
| OrderNo.16 Dt.28.10.2025 Sl,No.43 |
Presenti ForApplicant ForDefendant Ld.CounselD.BasuRaY None lA13967125 istakenuPforhearing Heard Ld.counselforSAApplicant. Considered. NoneappearsfortheDefendant F.l. |
|
| ss | Ld.Counselfor theApplicantfiledI.A.No3967of2025 prayingforwithdrawal ofthemainS.A. Theapplicationis supportedby Affidavitof theapplicantSriAbhishekDey' DuringthependencyoftheS,A.thematterhasbeen settledwiththeRespondentF.I.andtheRespondentF I' isnotgoingtocontinuewiththeinstantproceedingand hasissueda'NoDues Certiflcate'. Sincethisisan amicablesettlementbetweenthepartiesandthe Applicant intendstowithdrawthemain S.A., noprejudice will becausedifthe l.A.isallowedwithoutinviting responsefromotherside.Accordingly,theinstantLA.is allowedandstandsdisposedofaswithdrawn andsettled amicably. Interim orderdaled1310612025,passedbythisTribunal, stands vacated. S.A.No.930of2023alongwithallotherpendingI.A.s,if any,isdisposedofaswithdrawn, FilebeconsignedtoRecord Roomafterobservingall formalities. (KamalDe) PresidingOfficer DRT-3, Kolkata |
Sri Dilip Kumar De & Anr
Edelweiss Asset Reconstruction Co. Ltd.
Kamal De
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
