In an applicant vs bank matter, the Presiding Officer of the DRT disposed of the Securitization Application as infructuous because the respondent bank submitted that the account in question had been closed.
Securitization Application disposed of as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court of the Presiding Officer Debts Recovery Tribunal, Jaipur
Item No. 83
Case No.SA/571/2024
SYED MOHAMMED TALHA SABRI Vs PUNJAB NATIONAL BANK
Date: 29.10.2025.
Proceedings through hybrid mode Present:
Shri Kapil Kumar Kumawat, Counsel for the Applicant
Shri Rakesh Saini, Counsel for the Respondent Bank/FI
Ld. Counsel for the respondent bank submitted that account stands closed and he prayed that the SA may be disposed of as infractuous.
Considering the submissions made by Ld. Counsel for the respondent bank, this Securitization Application stands disposed of as infractuous.
File be consigned to record, as per rules. Copy of order be uploaded on website.
(Vimal Gupta) Presiding Officer Debts Recovery Tribunal, Jaipur
Syed Mohammed Talha Sabri
Punjab National Bank
Vimal Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
