Yes Bank v. Punam
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court of the Presiding Officer Debts Recovery Tribunal, Jaipur
Item No. 92
Case No.OA/844/2022
YES BANK Vs PUNAM KANWAR
Date: 28.10.2025. Proceedings through hybrid mode Present:
Ms Kratika Sharma, Counsel for the Applicant
None for the Defendants
In this matter, Counsel for the Applicant bank has filed IA vide diary No. 2695/25 for withdrawal of O.A. refund of court fees.
In view of the above submission, IA vide diary No. 2695/25 as well as this Original Application stands disposed of. Registry is directed to refund the court fees as per rules.
File be consigned to record, as per rules. Copy of order be uploaded on website.
(Vimal Gupta) Presiding Officer Debts Recovery Tribunal, Jaipur
Parties & counsel
- applicant
YES BANK
- other
PUNAM KANWAR
Coram
Vimal Gupta
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court