In this Single Application under the Recovery Act, the applicant was absent. The respondent bank argued that the applicant forcefully entered premises by breaking locks and acting outside the law, necessitating dismissal of the application.
Single Application dismissed; all pending Interlocutory Applications disposed of and dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court of the Presiding Officer Debts Recovery Tribunal, Jaipur
Item No. 51
Case No.SA/488/2024
SMT BAJRANGU BAI Vs INDIA SHELTER FINANCE CORPORATION LIMITED
Date: 24.07.2025.
Proceedings through hybrid mode Present:
None for the Applicant
Shri Akshat Kulshrestha, Counsel for the Respondent Bank/FI
In this matter, neither OTS has been presented nor have any payments been made.
Counsel for the bank submits that applicant have broken the locks and entered into premises. Courts are not meant for those people who take law in their hands.
In view of the above, SA stands disposed of dismissed, all pending IAs also stands disposed off, if any.
File be consigned to record as per rules. Copy of order be uploaded on website.
(Vimal Gupta) Presiding Officer Debts Recovery Tribunal, Jaipur
SMT BAJRANGU BAI
INDIA SHELTER FINANCE CORPORATION LIMITED
Vimal Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
