In a review application, the Debts Recovery Tribunal, Jaipur, disposed of the matter without substantive merits, directing the respondent bank to settle based on the applicant's counsel's submissions.
Review application disposed off; matter left to the bank to settle.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court of the Presiding Officer Debts Recovery Tribunal, Jaipur
Item No. 4
Case No.RA/6/2025 IN SA/359/2025
MS NEW SANGAM BRICKS Vs INDIAN BANK
Date: 24.07.2025.
Proceedings through hybrid mode Present:
Shri Rajesh Mootha, Counsel for the Applicant
None for the Respondent Bank/FI
This review is not maintainable as the counsel for the applicant submits that the Tribunal has not considered the payment he has made and the same is not true. The order by which he seeking review was a speaking order, therefore, I leave it to the bank if they want to settle the matter.
In view of the above submissions, this Review Application stands disposed off. File be consigned to record, as per rules. Copy of order be uploaded on website.
(Vimal Gupta) Presiding Officer Debts Recovery Tribunal, Jaipur
MS New Sangham Bricks
Indian Bank
Vimal Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
