In an appeal filed under Section 34 of the SARFAESI Act, the Debt Recovery Tribunal allowed the withdrawal of the applicant's suit/ appeal as the matter between the parties was settled. The appeal was disposed of as withdrawn.
Withdrawal of the appeal allowed; appeal disposed of as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court of the Presiding Officer Debts Recovery Tribunal, Jaipur
Item No. 41
Case No.SA/35/2024
YOGESH KUMAR SON OF SHRI RADHEYSHYAM GUPTA Vs AU SMALL FINANCE BANK LIMITED
Date: 24.07.2025.
Proceedings through hybrid mode
Present:
Shri Kuldeep Sharma, Counsel for the Applicant
Shri Akshat Kulshrestha, Counsel for the Respondent Bank/FI
Ld. Counsel for the applicant wants to withdraw this SA, as the matter has been settled between the parties.
Request is allowed.
As the matter has been settled between the parties, therefore SA stands disposed of as withdrawn.
File be consigned to record as per rules. Copy of order be uploaded on website.
(Vimal Gupta) Presiding Officer Debts Recovery Tribunal, Jaipur
YOGESH KUMAR SON OF SHRI RADHEYSHYAM GUPTA
AU SMALL FINANCE BANK LIMITED
Vimal Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
