Order dismissing a Securitization Application for default due to the non-appearance of the applicant despite passover, no reasons recorded.
Application dismissed in default of appearance.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court of the Presiding Officer Debts Recovery Tribunal, Jaipur
Item No. 30
Case No.SA/46/2023
RAMESH CHANDRA PALIWAL Vs STATE BANK OF INDIA
Date: 24.07.2025.
Proceedings through hybrid mode
Present:
None for the Applicant
Shri Kirti Kapoor, Counsel for the Respondent Bank/FI
Today, none appeared on behalf of the applicant despite passover, therefore, this Securitization Application stands dismissed in default.
File be consigned to record, as per rules. Copy of order be uploaded on website.
(Vimal Gupta) Presiding Officer Debts Recovery Tribunal, Jaipur
RAMESH CHANDRA PALIWAL
STATE BANK OF INDIA
Vimal Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
