The Division Bench disposed of S.A. No. 446/2022 as infructuous because the underlying account was settled and papers returned to the applicant, directing the respondent to return the original documents.
Respondent-F.I. directed to return documents if not required; matter disposed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL LUCKNOW
| Date oforderor proceeding |
I Order withsignatureofcourt | Officeaction taken with date |
|---|---|---|
| S.A.No.446/2022 07.10.2025 SL.No.51 |
Shri G. S. Mishra Ld. Counsel forthe applicantispresent. ShriRiteshGoel Ld.Counselforthe respondent-F.I. ispresent. Ld. Counsel for the respondent-F.I. e submits that tt#Taccount has beensettled bA and papershave beenreturnedbacktothe applicant. Ld. Counsel for the respondent-F.I.is directed to return back the documents,ifnot, requiredotherwise. In view of the fact, the SAbeing infructuousis disposedoff. Let the file be consigned to record room. Order be uploaded on the Tribunal’s website. (Dictated) ..„„;„„+ PresidingOfficer (Mugish) |
, |
Debts Recovery Tribunal Lucknow
Mugish
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
