Dismissed
Mr. Umesh Kumar M. Shrivastava v. State Bank of India
DRTSA/390/2025
What the court decided
AI extract
Outcome
Dismissed
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
| 12.09.2025 | Exh. | Roznama-MDRT-II S.A. No.390 of 2025 |
Next date |
|---|---|---|---|
| nrb – 38 | None for the Applicant. Ms Priti Tapdiya, Advocate for the Respondents. Order-sheet maintained by the learned Registrar shows that none present on previous date. Even today, no representation is made by the Applicant either personally or through the Advocate or through VC. Prima facie, it appears that the Applicant is not interested in pursuing this case any further. So, S.A. No.390 of 2025 stands dismissed and disposed of accordingly. File be consigned to the Record Room after due compliance. Sd/- P.O. DRT-II |
Closed |
Unknown Applicant
Respondents
PO Gokhale
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court