The Special Application dismissed due to lack of representation by the Applicant, who had not appeared personally or by counsel after settlement was claimed.
Special Application No. 207 of 2025 dismissed and disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
| 12.09.2025 | Exh. | Roznama-MDRT-II S.A. No.207 of 2025 |
Next date |
|---|---|---|---|
| None for the Applicant. Mr Krishna Jaiwar i/b Mr R.L. Motwani, Advocate for the Respondent. |
|||
| nrb – 36 | Ld. Advocate for the Respondent submits that the matter has been amicably settled between the parties. Order-sheet maintained shows that since earlier dates no representation was made by the Applicant. Even today, no representation is made by the Applicant either personally or through the Advocate or through VC. Prima facie, it appears that the Applicant is not interested in pursuing this case any further. So, S.A. No.207 of 2025 stands dismissed and disposed of accordingly. File be consigned to the Record Room after due compliance. Sd/- P.O. DRT-II |
Closed |
Applicant
Respondent
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
