Dismissed
Mr Vartika Sharma v. Hdfc Bank
DRTSA/386/2025
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
The Debts Recovery Tribunal dismissed Special Appeal S.A. No. 386/2025 for default due to the applicant's non-appearance.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL LUCKNOW
¶2
| Dateoforderor lroceedinJ |
Order withsignatureofcourt | Officeaction takenwithdate |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| S.A.No.386/2025 11.11.2025 SI No.59 |
None appearedfortheapplic It is submitted that video dated05.8.2025,itwasobserved respondent-bank is decided no proceed furtherwiththe auction conducted on 07.7.2025 cancelled the auction process. further submitted thatnothingrem foradjudicationin the SA,there the SA has become infructuous Ifindthat perhaps for therea applicant is not appearing before Tribunal,accordingly,SA dismissedfordefault Let thefilebeconsigne recordroom. |
ant. rder that tto sale and Itis ains fore, son, this is dto |
|
| Order be uploaded on |
the | ||
Tribunal’swebsite (Dictated) (Pravas Kun..g Presiding Offi (Veeresh) |
hE ingh) cer |
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- applicant
Applicant
- respondent
Respondent-Bank
Coram
AI extract
Pravesh Kungh
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court