Disposed
Aabid v. Smfg India Home Finance Company Ltd.
DRTSA/166/2025
What the court decided
AI extract
Outcome
Disposed
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
¶1
DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL LUCKNOW
¶2
| Date oforder or proceeding |
Order withsignatureof court | Officeaction taken with date |
|---|---|---|
| S.A. No. 166/2025 11.11.2025 SL.No.65 |
Noneappears forboththeparties. Ifind thatby order dated 08.10.2025it wasreportedby therespondent-F.I.thatan account has beensettledand closed. In view of the fact, the Securitization Application is disposed being infructuous. Let the file be consigned to record room. Order beuploadedon theTribunal’s website. (Dictated) b (PravasKuma,_.ngh) PresidingOfficer (Mugish) |
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- petitioner
Debts Recovery Tribunal Lucknow
- respondent
Securitization Applicant
Coram
AI extract
Pravas Kuma
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court