In this Securitization Application, the applicant defaulted in appearance, preventing the Presiding Officer from contacting the client. Consequently, the court dismissed the application in default without adjudication on merits.
Securitization Application dismissed in default.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court of the Presiding Officer Debts Recovery Tribunal, Jaipur
Item No. 28
Case No. SA/36/2024
PRERNA ENTERPRISES THROUGH ITS PROPRIETOR MANOJ KUMAR PRAJAPAT Vs KOTAK MAHINDRA PRIME LIMITED Date: 27.02.2025. Proceedings through hybrid mode Present:
Shri Hitesh Mishra, Counsel for the Applicant
Smt. Surbhi Bairathi , Counsel for the Respondent Bank/FI Counsel for the applicant submits that he is unable to contact his client. In these circumstances, this Securitization Application stands dismissed in default.
File be consigned to record, as per rules. Copy of order be uploaded on website.
(Vimal Gupta) Presiding Officer Debts Recovery Tribunal, Jaipur
Prerna Enterprises
Kotak Mahindra Prime Limited
Vimal Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
