Alam Khan v. Rajasthan Marudhara Gramin Bank
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court of the Presiding Officer Debts Recovery Tribunal, Jaipur
Item No. 30
Case No. MA/92/2024 IN OA/351/2023
ALAM KHAN Vs RAJASTHAN MARUDHARA GRAMIN BANK
Date: 27.02.2025.
Proceedings through hybrid mode
Present:
None for the Applicant
Shri Raj Kumar, Counsel for the Respondent Bank/FI
In this matter, application has been moved for setting aside the ex parte order dated 30.09.2023, but nobody is appearing on behalf of applicant even after passing over the matter.
The grievance is non service of the notice, but notices were proclaimed and demand notice of recovery have been sent on the same address and received by them. No one is there to prosecute the matter. Accordingly, MA stands disposed off, all pending IAs also stands disposed off, if any.
Parties & counsel
- applicant
ALAM KHAN
- respondent
RAJASTHAN MARUDHARA GRAMIN BANK
Coram
Vimal Gupta
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court