On withdrawal of an appeal by the applicant Bank of Baroda in a debt recovery tribunal, this court allowed the withdrawal and disposed of the appeal as withdrawn.
Allowed withdrawal of OA and disposed of the application as withdrawn. Court fees returned.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court of the Presiding Officer Debts Recovery Tribunal, Jaipur
Item No. 99
Case No. OA/589/2023
BANK OF BARODA Vs MS REDIFF DAIRY AND FOOD
PRODUCT
Date: 26.02.2025.
Proceedings through hybrid mode Present:
Ms. Surbhi Bairathi, Counsel for the Applicant
None for the defendants
Ld. Counsel for the applicant wants to withdraw this OA, as he does not want to pursue this OA and also requested to return the court fee.
Request is allowed.
As the applicant wants to withdraw this OA, therefore OA stands disposed of as withdrawn. Court fees may be returned as per the rules.
Copy of the order be given free to the concerned parties.
File be consigned to record as per rules.
(Vimal Gupta) Presiding Officer Debts Recovery Tribunal, Jaipur
cm
BANK OF BARODA
MS REDIFF DAIRY AND FOOD
Vimal Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
