Ram Singh Pal v. Icici Home Finance Company Ltd.
Case brief
What is this about?
S.A. disposed of as infructuous since respondent FI withdrew entire SARFAESI action from stage of demand notice under S. 13(2) of SARFAESI Act.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL LUCKNOW
| Date of order or lroceedin! |
Order withsignatureofcourt | Officeaction takenwithdate |
|---|---|---|
| SA No.08/2024 10.10.2025 Sl No.7 |
BH of Ldcounselfor theapplicantis present. BH of Ld counsel for therespondent bank ispresent. BH of Ld counsel for the respondent banksubmittedthat theentireSARFAESI action has been withdrawn by the Respondent FI from the stage ofdemand notice issued under section 13(2) ofthe SARFAESI Act, therefore, this S.A. become infructuous Submission is taken onrecord Since the entire SARFAESIActions from thestage of demandnoticehavebeen withdrawanby therespondentFI,therefore this S.A. has become infructous Accordingly, the S.A. is disposedof being infructuous. Recordbeconsigned torecord room. Pending I.As.ifany,alsodisposedoff. Order beuploadedon theTribunal’s website. (Dictated) ;d tbA . J~jf (PravasKumaFsTrfgh) PresidingOfficer (Manoj) |
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Debts Recovery Tribunal Lucknow
Application for Status of Appellant
Respondent Financial Institution
Pravash Kumar Tripathi
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court