Disposed
Amit Kumar Gupta v. Bajaj Finance Limited
DRTSA/119/2023
What the court decided
AI extract
Outcome
Disposed
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
¶1
DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL LUCKNOW
¶2
| Dateoforderor proceeding |
Orderwithsignatureofcourt | Officeaction takenwithdate |
|---|---|---|
| S.A.No.119/2023 09.10.2025 Sl No.55 |
BH of Mr. Harsh Chopra forthe applicantispresent. Mr. K.A. Dhruv, Ld. Counselfor therespondent-FIappearedthrough virtualmode Ld. Counselforthe respondent-FI submits that accountrelatingtothe SA hasbeensettled. Inviewoffact,theSA is disposed of being infructuous. |
|
| Let thefilebeconsignedto recordroom Order be uploaded on the Tribunal’swebsite. (Dictated) <br>(PravasKumar~b„fgh) PresidingOfficer (Veeresh) |
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- other
Debts Recovery Tribunal Lucknow
- applicant
Harsh Chopra
- respondent
Respondent-FI
Coram
AI extract
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court