Dismissed
Krishna Poojari v. Bank of Maharashtra
DRTSA/168/2022
What the court decided
AI extract
Outcome
Dismissed
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
¶1
| 28.04.2025 | Exh. | Roznama-MDRT-II S.A. No.168 of 2022 |
Next date |
|---|---|---|---|
| None for the Applicant. Mr Prafull Chipte i/b M/s. M & S Legal Ventures, Advocate for Respondent. |
|||
| Order-sheet of the learned Registrar dated 17.01.2025 shows that no representation was made by the |
|||
| rst - 52 | Applicant. Even today, no representation is made by the Applicant either personally or through the Advocate. Prima facie, it appears that the Applicant is not interested in pursuing this case any further. So, S.A. No.168 of 2022 stands dismissed and disposed of accordingly. Pending IAs stands disposed of. File be consigned to the Record Room after due compliance. Sd/- P.O. DRT-II |
Closed |
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- appellant
Undisclosed Applicant
- respondent
Unidentified Respondent
Coram
AI extract
P.O.
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court