Satish Nandlal Yadav v. Idfc First Bank Ltd.
DRTSA/169/2025
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
¶1
| 25.04.2025 | Exh. | Roznama-MDRT-II S.A. No.169 of 2025 |
Next date |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mr Sunil Kadam, Advocate for the Applicant. |
|||
| Ms Neelam Yadav, Advocate for Respondent. |
|||
| nrb - 08 | 8 | Counsel for the Applicant filed pursis for withdrawal of the S.A. (exhibit-8) stating that the matter has been settled and the Respondent Bank has issued the no dues certificate to the Applicant on 16.04.2025. Since nothing survives in the S.A., Counsel for the Applicant prays for the withdrawal of the S.A. to which Counsel for the Respondent does not object. Prayer Allowed. S.A. No.169 of 2025 stands disposed of as withdrawn. Pending IAs, if any, stand disposed of. File be consigned to the Record Room after due compliance. Sd/- P.O. DRT-II |
Closed |
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court