In Special Appeal No. 196 of 2024, both the Applicant and Respondent absent. The court dismissed the appeal due to non-appearance.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
| 28.04.2025 | Exh. | Roznama-MDRT-II S.A. No.196 of 2024 |
Next date |
|---|---|---|---|
| Both parties absent. | |||
| Case called out but there is no response from either of the parties. Order-sheet of the learned Registrar dated 20.01.2025 shows that no representation was made by the |
|||
| rst - 54 | Applicant. Even today, no representation is made by the Applicant either personally or through the Advocate. Prima facie, it appears that the Applicant is not interested in pursuing this case any further. So, S.A. No.196 of 2024 stands dismissed and disposed of accordingly. Pending IAs stands disposed of. File be consigned to the Record Room after due compliance. Sd/- P.O. DRT-II |
Closed |
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
