Court dismissed the Securitisation Application as withdrawn due to settlement between parties. Applicant requested withdrawal of application after consent to Respondent Bank's settlement letter.
Securitisation Application dismissed as withdrawn; Record consigned to record room.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
PAGE NO
CONTD. ORDER. SHEET
CASE NO
| DATE | DESCRIPTION OF THE ORDER | REMARK |
|---|---|---|
| sA 1047/74 17t04/25 |
Appticantsby ShriAshishGanguty, Advocate Respondent-Bank byShriAbhishek Agrawat, Advocate Matterwastakenup onanAppticationforDismissalof SecuritisationApplicationlA2995125dated16104/25 fitedbytheRespondent-Fl. TheCounselforRespondent Banksubmittedthatthe matterhasbeensetttedbetweenthePartiesand the Respondent-Fl has issuedSettlementLetterEx.lA-1 foran amountofRs.45Lakhtobe depositedbythe Appticants.Hefurthersubmittedthat thepresentSA istherefore notmaintainabteand maybedismissed. CounselfortheAppticantsfairtyconsentedtothe submissionsmadebytheCounselforRespondent-Fl andpraystoaltowtheAppticantstowithdrawalof thepresentSA. |
|
| lnviewof the fact that thematterhasbeen settted betweenthePartiesandaccordinglytheCounselfor Appticantpraysthathemay be attowedtowithdraw thepresentSA,thematterstandsdismissedas withdrawn.Recordbeconsignedtorecordroom. (RamNi as Pate[) Presidingofficer |
Applicants
Respondent-Bank
Ram Nivas Pati
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
