Dismissed
Smt Barkha Notani v. Cholamandalam Investment and Finance Company Limited
DRTSA/165/2022
What the court decided
AI extract
Outcome
Dismissed
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
GONTD. ORDER. SHEET
PAGE NO
CASE NO
| DATE | DESCRIPTION OF THE ORDER | REMARK |
|---|---|---|
| 5A165/72 17/04t25 |
Applicantsby ShriSourabhKhanojia,Advocate Respondent-Fl byShriAbhishekAgrawal,Advocate Matterwastakenuponanappticationfordismissalof SecuritisationApptication lA1639/25dated'19l03/25 filedbytheRespondent-Fl. TheCounselforRespondent Banksubmittedthatthe matterhasbeensettledbetweentheParties and the Respondent-Fl has No DueCertificateEx.lA-1tothe Applicant. CounselfortheApplicantsfairtyconsentedtothe submissionsmadebytheCounselforRespondentFl andpraystoaltowtheAppticantstowithdrawalof thepresentSA. ln viewofthefact that thematterhasbeen settted betweentheParties and accordinglytheCounselfor Appticantpraysthathemaybealtowedtowithdraw thepresentSA,thematterstandsdismissedas withdrawn.Record be consignedtorecordroom. (Ra Patet) Presidi officer |
Applicant
Respondent (First)
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court