In an ex-parte application under the RDB Act 1993, the Debt Recovery Tribunal allowed the State Bank of India's claim of Rs. 42.84 Lakhs against absentee defendants, ordering recovery with interest and a recovery certificate.
Claim of Rs. 42.84 Lakhs allowed with 8.7% interest; recovery certificate issued; repayment notice issued within 30 days.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
J
BEFORE THE DEBTS RECOVERY TRTBUT{AL-IIt KOLI(ATA
PRESENTT -SRt KAtilAL DE.
PRESIDING OFFICER,
O.A. a4 of 2024
DATE OF DELIVERY OF ORDER | 2610612025
St.tc Bank ot Indh, a body corporate constltuted under the State Bank of India Act, 1955, havlng lts local Head Omce at 1, Strand Road, Kotkata-7oo 001 and carrylng on Business, lnter alla, from its Branch Offtce, amongst others, commonly known as RACPC South Kolkata, 1n Floor, Wtndsor Belghts, Kamalgazt, Narendrapur, Oistrlct- South 24-Parganas, PIN-700 103, including the SARB South Bengat Office, at 1, Middleton Street, Jeevandlp Building, 2"d Floor, Kolkata-7OO 071,
... Applicant Bank
-Versus-
3, lils Uttlm Contractor, under theproprietorship of Uttam Das having business unit at 218, Fern road, Ballygunge, Kolkata-7oo 019,
... Defendants
For the Appllcant Bank: Mr. Md. Amjad Ali, Ld. Advocate, Ms. M. Begum, Ld. Advocate
For the Defendant : None
Set ex-parte on 16/0512025
JUDGEMENT
1,
The appllcant Bank filed the present Ortglnal Applicauon, being O.A. 84 of 2024, on 29101/2024 for recov€ry of a totat sum of Rs.42,84,018.18 (Rupees Forty Two Lakh Etghty Four Thousand Elghteen and Elghteen patse only) from the defendants towards Cash Credat facllity wlth lnterest, cost and other usual rellefs.
The defendants are served with summons. The defendants dld not appear, as there was no representation from the defendants, the case was fixed for ex.parte hearing on t6/0612O2S, and heard ex-parte accordlngly.
Heard the Ld. Counsel for the applicant Bank.
Whether the appllcant Bank ls enfltled to the clatm made ln the OA agatnst the defendants and OA schedule proper es as prayed for?
5,
),
In the resurt, the present origrnar Appflcation is aflowed ex-parte with costs, as uncter:-
ORDER
t':"i,:::"i'T1"""jff::;L:::':-n
3
Accordlngly, the Orlgtnal Appllca0on betng O,A. 84 of ZO24 is allowed and stands dlsposed of.
Copy of the JudgmenvFtnal Order be uploaded tn the Trtbunal,s webslte. Flle ls conslgned to the Recgrd Rogm.
(Dictated to stano, transcribed by him, corrected, slaned and pronounced by me In thc open Court on the 26d d;y of June, 2O2S)
( KAI,IAL DE ) PRESIDTNG OEFtCER.
Debts Recovery Tribunal-3, Kolkata Order Sheet (Continuation)
State Bank of tndla
O.A. a4 of 2024
Order No.09
Dt.26 /06/ 2025 Order pronounced (vade separate sheets).
mb
In the result, O.A. 84 of 2024 ts a owed wtth costs. Issue
Recovery Certiflcate accordingly.
( Kamat De )
Presidrng Ofticer
DRT-3, Kotkata
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the applicant Bank is entitled to recover the claimed debt from the defendants?
State Bank of India
Sri Uttam Das
Smt. Soma Das
Hls Uttam Contractor
Kamall De
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
