Sitting ex-parte, the Tribunal allowed an Original Application filed by Canara Bank to determine debt against the respondents. The claim including principal, interest, and costs was decreed.
Allowed O.A. 383 of 2022; Debt determined at Rs.65,51,334.37 with interest; Recovery Certificate issued; Debts recovered by sale of secured or personal assets.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
BEFORE THE DEBTS RECOVERY TRTBUT{AL.ITT KOLXATA PRESEI{TI .sRt KA]rIAL DE.
PRESTDIT{G OFFTCER.
O.A, 383 or 2022
DATE OF DELfVERY OF ORDER : 20!0612025
Carara Bank, a body corDorate
j:- H:':",',"":i"',:".:-il*.;gr ::iiil! ti.:ld:.. T:jIB,f : :iTj:: ru",:m:;:ir::1,t",=#[1il;fr1il""",.ki#T#[ilrygir;";
" Applicant gank
-versus-
i,lrlfl[:l]3:il.#rf:su*.r:fu_il*L!,i.,;..?{;,i;:,r;r:t ;il:rt'An lll choudhury.restding at No. 1, convent Rod, Entalty, Kolkata-7oo
... Defendants
l
For the Applicant Banki Mr.pratiyush Verma, Ld. Advocate,
For the Defendant
None
Set ex-parte on i/06/2025
]UDGEMENT
i:,"?ffi :"**,,T"r##:;##j#t#ffi ;xfl ",
ff :Iiir"#"11ffI"I"lTilllll"i:,liil,"liij;::rilil:
Whether the appltcant Bank is I "",o^ t"n"rri. r.offi;:r#i":i the clarm made rn the oA asarnst the derendants
2
As stated supra, the defendants remalnedabsent and did not turn up to controvert the veElon of the O.A, of appllcant Bank. The EvidenceAffldavltcoupled withthe recltalsin the documents viz., Exhibits Annexure-A-1 to Exhiblt Annexure-A-21markedon behalf of the appllcant Bank, established the clalm of the appllcant Bank agalnst thedefendantsand OA schedule propertles. Hence, I hold that the defendants are, Jointly and severally, liable to pay to the appllcant Bank the clalms made ln the OA wlth future lnterest and costs,
In the result, the present Origlnal Appllcation is allowed ex-parte with costs, as under:-
ORDER
) -
3
Bank under Sectlon 19(22) of the Recovery of oebts due to the Bank and Flnanclal Instltutlons Act, 1993 now known as Recovery of Debts and Blnkruptcy Act, 1993,
Accordlngly, the Orlglnal Appllcatlon belng O,A. 383 ol 2022 ls allowed and stands disposed of.
Copy of the JudgmenvFlnal Order be uploaded tn the Trtbunal! webstte. File ls conslgned to the Record Room,
(Dlctated to steno, transcrtbed by htm, corrccted, slgned aM pronounced by me ln the open Court on the 20b day of June, 2025)
( KAMAL DE ) PRESTDING OFFtCER.
Debts RecoveryTribunal-3, Kolkata Order Sheet (Continuation)
Canar. Bank
Case No.:
Vr.
O.A. 3E3 of 2022
OatG ot Order ordrr wlth slgnature
Order No.09 order pronounced (vide seParate sheets).
Dt.2010612025
mb
In the result, o.A. 383 of 2022 ls allowed wlth costs'
Recovery Certlfl cate accordlnglY.
I Kamal De )
Presiding Officer
DRT-3, Kolkata
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the applicant Bank is entitled to recover the claim made in the O.A. against the defendants.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Canara Bank
Anil Choudhury
KAMAL DE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
