State Bank of India v. Umed Singh
Case brief
What is this about?
The Debts Recovery Tribunal allowed the withdrawal of an arbitral award appeal filed by SBI against Umud Singh and directed the refund of court fees.
What did the court decide?
Withdrawal of O.A. allowed; refund of court fees directed.
What the court decided
Court of the Presiding Officer Debts Recovery Tribunal, Jaipur
Item No. 99
Case No. OA/715/2023
STATE BANK OF INDIA Vs UMED SINGH
Date: 06.10.2025.
Proceedings through hybrid mode Present:
Shri Deepak Saxena, Counsel for the Applicant
Counsel for the Applicant bank submitted that the account is settled. He wants to withdraw this O.A and he prays for the refund of the court fees.
Heard the applicant.
The prayer for withdrawal of OA and refund of court fees is allowed. Registry is directed to refund the court fees as per rule. Accordingly, this OA stands disposed of.
File be consigned to record, as per rules. Copy of order be uploaded on website.
(Vimal Gupta) Presiding Officer Debts Recovery Tribunal, Jaipur
Parties & counsel
- appellant
STATE BANK OF INDIA
- respondent
UMED SINGH
Coram
Vimal Gupta
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court