The applicant bank moved to withdraw the original application seeking recovery and requested refund of court fees as the account was settled. The DRT allowed the withdrawal and directed the registry to refund fees.
Withdrawal of OA allowed and refund of court fees directed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court of the Presiding Officer Debts Recovery Tribunal, Jaipur
Item No. 126
Case No.OA/551/2022
IDFC BANK LIMITED Vs P M TEXTILES
Date: 23.09.2025.
Proceedings through hybrid mode Present:
Shri Piyush Khandelwal, Counsel for the Applicant
Defendants are ex-parte
Counsel for the Applicant bank submitted that the account is settled. He wants to withdraw this O.A and he prays for the refund of the court fees.
Heard the applicant.
The prayer for withdrawal of OA and refund of court fees is allowed. Registry is directed to refund the court fees as per rule. Accordingly, this OA stands disposed of.
File be consigned to record, as per rules. Copy of order be uploaded on website.
(Vimal Gupta) Presiding Officer Debts Recovery Tribunal, Jaipur
IDFC BANK LIMITED
P M TEXTILES
Vimal Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
