Disposed

Uco Bank v. Resonance Industries

DRT7 Jul 2025OA/477/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Tribunal disposed of an Original Application regarding a Title Deed dispute after the parties settled amicably. The Bank was directed to return the deed and is eligible for a court fee refund. The other pending application in the same case was also disposed of.

What did the court decide?

Directing the returned of the original Title Deed and dismissal of the application allowing for a refund of court fees.

Uco Bank versus Resonance Industries — Partition | DRT (2025)

¶1

Debts Recovery^{Tribunal-3, Kolkata} Order Sheet (Continuation)

¶2

Case oa/47	7/2022 Resonance^Indus!l!!9 UCOBank
DateofOrder	Orderwith^signature	necessarv
orderNo.06 Dt.oj.07.2025 Sl.No.15 1" I	Present; ForAPPlicant^: ForDefendant lAl25}lt25^{istakenupfor hearing'} nJu.ar-1,iornt"r^{appearingfor ApplicantBank'} considered. Noneappears^{from theside oftheDefendant'} Ld. Counsel^{AnamikaSaha(VirtualMode)} :None toreturn^{theoriginalTitleDeed} itisnotalready^{done,within15} order,as^{per rules.} Ld.Counsel^{for theApplicantfiledl A No2581of 2025in} ;i";; t;"iactthai^{theo A whichwasfiledseeking} :;:;";;'';iRs.28,78,103.36/-^{issettledandhaspraved} i..",iioi""r^{oitt,"pr."t"nto A Theapplicationis-} i;r#;;^-;; "niaiuit 'orsriNaveen Ramnani'chier Manaoer oftheaPPlicant^Bank' n".in.thFDendencvofthe^OA'^{thedefendanthas} I#.Lrit"i ""4^{,"ttl"otn"matter and theApplicant} i"""Ii"t-.r".0^{inareceivedthesettledamountand} ;";;;;;"";1;;itpose^{ofthe matter fornonprosecutron'} ii-"r" it^iiotr."r- impediment^{if prayerisso allowed} TheAoolicant has^{filedthesameIAseekingrefundof} .;;; i;t.;; laias refund^{ofcourtfee;sconcerned'he} ;;';;;;;r.h berorethe^{LdRegistrarwhowilltake} "^{r"'.ooi'","-J".'i,"ninthematter as per extantrules'} ;::;;;i";i;. in.^{r'rozser or2025isdisposedoras} itna."'*L'l"o^{settled amicably'LA2684of2025being} the^putup^{petitionisalsodisposedof'} The Applicant^isdirected rotheo,A.defendant,^if daysfrom^{the date of this} O.A. No.^{477of2022alongwithallpendingI A-s'ifany'} itJrcpot"a^{ofaswithdrau/nbeingsettled amicablv'} Filebeconsigned^{toRecord Roomafterobservingall} formalities.
	(KamalDe) PresidingOfficer DRT-3, Kolkata

¶3

l

Uco Bank v. Resonance Industries

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Uco Bank v. Resonance Industries

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Resolution Enterprises and Ors. versus Axis Bank

Punjab National Bank versus Nirmalya Saha and Anr.

Punjab National Bank versus Dipak Ghosh

Bank of India versus Ms Arijit Enterprise and Ors.

Tanuja Bibi versus Indian Bank

Canara Bank versus Ms Ashmita Enterprise and Anr.