The applicant bank sought withdrawal of Original Application OA/434/2023 due to account settlement. The Tribunal allowed withdrawal and directed court fee refund.
Application withdrawn; court fees refunded.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court of the Presiding Officer Debts Recovery Tribunal, Jaipur
Item No. 103
Case No.OA/434/2023
KOTAK MAHINDRA BANK LIMITED Vs M L CONSTRUCTION COMPANY
Date: 23.12.2025.
Proceedings through hybrid mode Present:
Shri Jitendra Choudhary , Counsel for the applicant
None for the Defendants
In this matter, Ld. Counsel for the applicant bank submits that the account stands settled and he wants to withdraw this Original Application and prayed for refund of court fee.
In view of the above submission, this Original Application stands disposed off. Registry is directed to refund the court fees as per rules.
File be consigned to record, as per rules. Copy of order be uploaded on website.
(Vimal Gupta) Presiding Officer Debts Recovery Tribunal, Jaipur
Kotak Mahindra Bank Limited
M L Construction Company
Vimal Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
