In this Dt Recovery Tribunal order, the applicant bank sought withdrawal of an Original Application as the account was settled, hearing the case via hybrid mode.
Refund of court fee directed
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court of the Presiding Officer Debts Recovery Tribunal, Jaipur
Item No. 104
Case No.OA/1394/2023
KOTAK MAHINDRA BANK LIMITED Vs M/S AMEGA GYPSUM INDUSTRIES
Date: 23.12.2025.
Proceedings through hybrid mode Present:
Shri Jitendra Choudhary , Counsel for the applicant
None for the Defendants
In this matter, Ld. Counsel for the applicant bank submits that the account stands settled and he wants to withdraw this Original Application and prayed for refund of court fee.
In view of the above submission, this Original Application stands disposed off. Registry is directed to refund the court fees as per rules.
File be consigned to record, as per rules. Copy of order be uploaded on website.
(Vimal Gupta) Presiding Officer Debts Recovery Tribunal, Jaipur
KOTAK MAHINDRA BANK LIMITED
M/S AMEGA GYPSUM INDUSTRIES
Vimal Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
