The applicant bank moved to withdraw its Original Application as the account was settled and submitted for a refund of court fee. The Presiding Officer disposed of the application and directed the refund of court fees per rules.
Refund of court fees directed to be processed by registry.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court of the Presiding Officer Debts Recovery Tribunal, Jaipur
Item No. 99
Case No.OA/647/2025
STATE BANK OF INDIA Vs PURAN RAM
Date: 22.12.2025.
Proceedings through hybrid mode Present:
Shri Ayush Sharma, Counsel for the applicant
None for the Defendants
In this matter, Ld. Counsel for the applicant bank submits that the account stands settled and he wants to withdraw this Original Application and prayed for refund of court fee.
In view of the above submission, this Original Application stands disposed off. Registry is directed to refund the court fees as per rules.
File be consigned to record, as per rules. Copy of order be uploaded on website.
(Vimal Gupta) Presiding Officer Debts Recovery Tribunal, Jaipur
STATE BANK OF INDIA
PURAN RAM
Vimal Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
