Canara Bank v. Smt Radha Devi
Case brief
What is this about?
An order by the Presiding Officer, DRT, Jaipur, disposing of an objection/appeal via withdrawal upon the appellant bank consent. Court allowed withdrawal and directed refund of court fees.
What did the court decide?
Allowed withdrawal of OA and refund of court fees.
What the court decided
Court of the Presiding Officer Debts Recovery Tribunal, Jaipur
Item No. 52
Case No. OA/292/2022
CANARA BANK Vs SMT RADHA DEVI .
Date: 26.11.2025.
Proceedings through hybrid mode Present:
Shri Vikas Jain, Counsel for the Applicant
Counsel for the Applicant bank submitted that the account is settled. He wants to withdraw this O.A and he prays for the refund of the court fees.
Heard the applicant.
The prayer for withdrawal of OA and refund of court fees is allowed. Registry is directed to refund the court fees as per rule. Accordingly, this OA stands disposed of.
File be consigned to record, as per rules. Copy of order be uploaded on website.
(Vimal Gupta) Presiding Officer Debts Recovery Tribunal, Jaipur
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the application for withdrawal of the order and refund of court fees should be allowed.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
CANARA BANK
- respondent
SMT RADHA DEVI
Coram
Vimal Gupta
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
2 orders share this CNR
- Order 1 · Presiding Officer
- Order 2 — this page · Vimal Gupta
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court