The Debts Recovery Tribunal dismissed the applicant's side appeal as infructuous because the underlying account had been closed. Pending interlocutory applications were also disposed of.
Side appeal dismissed as infructuous; pending IAs disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court of the Presiding Officer Debts Recovery Tribunal, Jaipur
Item No. 16
Case No.SA/238/2025
BHAVESH KUMAR SUMERIYA Vs INDIAN BANK
Date: 21.11.2025. Proceedings through hybrid mode Present:
None for the Applicant
Shri Ashish Srivastava, Counsel for the Respondent Bank/FI
In this matter, Counsel for the Respondent submits that the account has been closed and SA may be disposed of as infractuous.
Considering the submission made by Counsel for the Respondent, SA stands disposed off as infractuous, all pending IAs also stands disposed off, if any.
File be consigned to record as per rules. Copy of order be uploaded on website.
(Vimal Gupta) Presiding Officer Debts Recovery Tribunal, Jaipur
Bhavesh Kumar Sumeriya
Indian Bank
Vimal Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
