Dismissed
Tagus Engineering Pvt. Ltd. v. L and T Finance Limited
DRTMA/29/2023
What the court decided
AI extract
Outcome
Dismissed
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
| 07.03.2025 | Exh. | Roznama-MDRT-II M.A. No.29 of 2023 |
Next date |
|---|---|---|---|
| None for the Applicant. |
|||
| Mr Shantanu Ray (through VC), Advocate for Respondent. |
|||
| rst – 44 | Order-sheet dated 23.09.2024 of the learned Registrar shows that none was present on behalf of the Applicant. Even today, no representation is made by the Applicant either personally or through the advocate. It appears from the conduct of the Applicant that he is not interested in pursuing this case any further. So, M.A. No.29 of 2023 stands dismissed for want of prosecution. File be consigned to the Record Room after due compliance. Sd/- P.O. DRT-II |
Closed |
Applicant
Respondent
P.O.
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court