This one-line order dismissed Special Appeal No. 158 of 2022 for want of prosecution as the applicant failed to appear on two consecutive dates.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
| 07.03.2025 | Exh. | Roznama-MDRT-II S.A. No.158 of 2022 |
Next date |
|---|---|---|---|
| None for the parties. | |||
| rst - 22 | Order-sheet dated 09.09.2024 of the learned Registrar shows that none was present on behalf of the Applicant. Even today, no representation is made by the Applicant either personally or through the advocate. It appears from the conduct of the Applicant that he is not interested in pursuing this case any further. So, S.A. No.158 of 2022 stands dismissed for want of prosecution. File be consigned to the Record Room after due compliance. Sd/- P.O. DRT-II |
Closed |
Applicant
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
