The single-judge order dismisses Appeal No.14 of 2023 for want of prosecution due to the appellant's prolonged absence and apparent lack of interest in pursuing the case.
Appeal No.14 of 2023 dismissed for want of prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
| 07.03.2025 | Exh. | Roznama-MDRT-II Appeal No.14 of 2023 |
Next date |
|---|---|---|---|
| None for the Appellant. Mr Umar F. Azam, Advocate for Respondent, Union Bank of India. |
|||
| Case called out but there is no response from counsel for the |
|||
| rst - 18 | Appellant. It is apparent from the record that since 09.08.2023, the Appellant remained absent in the matter. It appears from the conduct of the Appellant that he is not interested in pursuing this case any further. So, Appeal No.14 of 2023 stands dismissed for want of prosecution. File be consigned to the Record Room after due compliance. Sd/- P.O. DRT-II |
Closed |
Appellant
Union Bank of India
P.O.
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
