Dismissed
Kailash Bansal v. Bank of Baroda
DRTSA/76/2022
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Application dismissed for non-appearance and failure to file withdrawal; matter settled amicable
What did the court decide?
Application No.76 of 2022 is dismissed with no order as to costs.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL No.2, MUMBAI (BEFORE HON’BLE PRESIDING OFFICER) ORDER SHEET
¶2
05.04.2024 Sr. No.22
¶3
| SA No.76 of 2022 | ||
|---|---|---|
| classifi -cation |
No. of Exh. |
Kailash Bansal Vs. Bank of Baroda |
| None for the parties. | ||
| 1. The order-sheet maintained by the learned Registrar shows that the parties have amicably settled the matter. On 11thAugust 2023, the applicant’s counsel sought adjournment to file withdrawal application. On 15th December 2023, the applicant’s counsel neither appeared nor file withdrawal, application and therefore, the matter is listed under caption ‘dismissal’. Even today, the applicant neither entered appearance nor filed the withdrawal application. Hence, Securitisation Application No.76 of 2022 stands dismissed with no order as to costs. 2. Pending Interlocutory Applications, if any, stands disposed of. |
||
| Sd/- Presiding Officer, DRT-2, Mumbai |
¶4
Radhika
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- applicant
Kailash Bansal
- respondent
Bank of Baroda
Coram
AI extract
Hon'ble Presiding Officer
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court