The Debt Recovery Tribunal allowed an interlocutory application seeking permission to withdraw the original money recovery application following an amicable settlement, and subsequently dismissed the main application as withdrawn with directions for fee refund.
Original Application No.152 of 2022 stands dismissed as withdrawn; court fees to be refunded.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL No.2, MUMBAI
(BEFORE HON’BLE PRESIDING OFFICER)
Sr. No.21
INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION No.713 of 2024
In
ORIGINAL APPLICATION NO.152 of 2022
Union Bank of India
… Applicant
Versus
Deepak Babruvan Giri & Ors. … Defendants
Mr Harsh Gutka i/b M/s. Anup Khaitan & Co. – Advocates for the applicant.
None for defendants.
Shri Deepak M. Thakkar Presiding Officer, 4th April 2024.
ORDER
Sd/-
(Deepak M. Thakkar) Presiding Officer, DRT-2, Mumbai
Radhika
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL No.2, MUMBAI
(BEFORE HON’BLE PRESIDING OFFICER)
ORDER SHEET
04.04.2024
Sr. No.21
| OA No.152 of 2022 | ||
|---|---|---|
| classifi -cation |
No. of Exh. |
Union Bank of India Vs. Deepak Babruvan Giri & Ors. |
| Mr Harsh Gutka i/b M/s. Anup Khaitan & Co. – Advocates for the applicant. None for defendants. |
||
| 14 | 1. The learned counsel for the applicant has presented I.A. No.713 of 2024 supported by affidavit (exhibit-14), which is taken on record. 2. Order in Interlocutory Application No.713 of 2024 passed separately. 3. In view of the order passed in Interlocutory Application No.713 of 2024, Original Application No.152 of 2022 stands dismissed as withdrawn with no order as to costs. 4. The learned Registrar is directed to refund the court fees as per the Rules. |
|
| Sd/- Presiding Officer, DRT-2, Mumbai |
Radhika
Union Bank of India
Deepak M. Thakkar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
