This order records that the applicant sought adjournment to withdraw his Securitisation Application but failed to file the withdrawal or make representations. The application was disposed of as parties had amicably settled the matter.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL No.2, MUMBAI
(BEFORE HON’BLE PRESIDING OFFICER) ORDER SHEET
05.04.2024 Sr. No.19
| SA No.244 of 2022 | ||
|---|---|---|
| classifi -cation |
No. of Exh. |
Mr. Dilip Somay Vs. Canara Bank |
| None for the parties. | ||
| 1. Order-sheet maintained by the learned Registrar shows that the parties have amicably settled the matter. On 16thAugust 2023 and 18thDecember 2023, the applicant sought adjournment to withdraw the Securitisation Application. The applicant neither made representation nor file the withdrawal application. Hence, Securitisation Application No.244 of 2022 stands disposed of with no order as to costs. |
||
| 2. Pending Interlocutory Applications, if any, stands disposed of. |
||
| Sd/- Presiding Officer, DRT-2, Mumbai |
Radhika
Mr. Dilip Somay
Canara Bank
Presiding Officer
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
