Disposed
Smilax Trexim Pvt. Ltd. and Anr. v. Idfc First Bank Ltd.
DRTSA/398/2023
What the court decided
AI extract
Outcome
Disposed
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
DebtsRecovery Tribunal-3' Kolkata OrderSheet (Continuation)
casE r.to. sl/aeg/zoza
@stBankLtd'
Order withsignature
OrderNo, pt.1210212024 Sl,No.16
Present: ior,qppficantI Mr. PrasejitSaha'Ld Counsel For Defendant:
Ld Counselfor the Oefendant Bank filedl A No 328 of 2024 praying forwithdrawalof the main S ATheapplication is supportedby Affidavit of shri Jeet Dutta'Manager of the RespondentBankDuringthe pendency of the S A the matter has been settledwith theRespondent Bankand theRespondentBank is notgoing tocontinuewith the instant proceeding and has issued a'No DuesCertificate'. Since this is an amicablesettlement between theparties and the Applicantintends to withdrawthe main S.A.,no preiudicewillbe causedif the I A is allowedwithout inviting responsefrom other side Accordingly, the instant LA is allowed and standsdisposed of in thecategoryof dismissed as withdrawn assettled amicably. l.A. No 326 of 2024 beingthe put uppetition isalso disposed of.
S.A. No. 398 of2023 alongwith all other pendingI A s, if any, are disposed of as withdrawn.
File be consignedto Record Room afterobserving all formalities'
( Kamal De ) Presiding Officer DRT-3, Kolkata
Oefendant Bank
Kamal De
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court