DRT-3 Kolkata disposed of an original application and interim application as withdrawn and settled amicably after the debt was realized and a No Dues Certificate was issued, directing return of documents.
Dismissed O.A. No.397 of 2022 and all pending I.A.s as withdrawn setttled amicably; applicant directed to return Title Deed within 15 days.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Debts Recovery Tribunat-3, Kolkata Order Sheet (Continuation)
Case No, OAl397l2022
State Bank of India Vs. Arup Kumar Chakraborty and anr.
| Dateof Order |
Orderwithsignature |
|---|---|
| OrderNo. pt.2/02/2024 Sl.No.20 |
Present: ForApplicant:APramanickalongwith RKundu,Ld Counsel ForDefendant:None |
| som | LdCounselfor theApplicantfiledI.A.No. 242of2024inviewof the factthat theO.A.wasfiledseeking recoveryofRs. 2O,92,O92/-andprayedforwithdrawalof thepresent O.A.The applacationissupportedbyaffidavitofMr.JayantaKumar Bhowmick,ChiefManageroftheapplicantBank. Duringthe pendencyoftheO.A.thedefendanthavecompromisedand settledthematter andtheapplicantbankhasrealizedand receivedthe settledamount andissuedthe'NoDuesCertificate' dated1a/L2/2023and made prayertodisposeofthematterfor nonprosecution.Thereisnootherimpedimentifprayerjsso allowed.Accordingly,I.A.No.242ol2023isdisposedofas withdrawnassettled amicably.I.A.No.241123beingthe putup petitionis also disposedof, The Applicantisdirectedtoreturn theoriginalTitleDeedtothe O.A,defendantsif itisnotalready returnedwithin15days from thedate ofthisorder. O,A. No,397of2022alongwithallpendingI.A.s,ifany,are dismissedaswithdrawnassettled amicably. File beconsignedtoRecord Roomafterobserving allformalities. 1<amat661 PresidingOfficer DRT-3, Kolkata |
State Bank of India
Arup Kumar Chakraborty
Presiding Officer
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
