Disposed
Salimpasha Ahmoddin Ravane v. State Bank of India
DRTSA/142/2022
What the court decided
AI extract
Outcome
Disposed
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL, AURANGABAD (BEFORE HON’BLE PRESIDING OFFICER, AURANGABAD) ORDER SHEET
| 23.04. Sr. No |
2024 .67 S.A.NO. 142/2022 |
|
|---|---|---|
| Classific ation |
No. of Exh. |
|
| SECURITISATION APPLICATIONNO. 142/2022 Salimpasha Ahmoddin Ravane .. Applicant Versus State Bank Of India& others .. Respondent Mr. D.D.Deshmukh h/for Mr. Deshmukh Anand I - Advocate for the applicant. Mr.Suhas R. Shirsat – Advocate for respondent 1. The learned counsel appearing for the applicant requests to re- notify the matter as main counsel is out of station due to his personal difficulty. 2. The Learned counsel for the respondent bank submits that the matter is already settled and the applicant has paid more than Rs.9 lac and approximately a sum of Rs.40,000/- is remaining to be paid. 3. The applicant is directed to pay the said amount with the bank as agreed. 4. In view of the above, I pass the following order : ORDER |
||
| A. The Securitisation Application No.142/2022 is disposed of as settled. |
||
| B. All pending IA in the proceeding if any are disposed of accordingly. Interim orders if any also stands vacated C. Consign the file to the Record Room and orders be uploaded on official web-site. |
||
(Vimal Gupta) Presiding Officer Debts Recovery Tribunal, Aurangabad |
[APK]
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court