The Tribunal allowed the application for restoration of an original application that was previously stayed due to non-filing of the document.
Restoration of Original Application no. 2016 to its original stage.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL, AURANGABAD (BEFORE HON’BLE PRESIDING OFFICER, DRT AT AURANGABAD) ORDER SHEET
| 23.04. Sr. No |
2024 .21 |
M.A.NO. 24/2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Classific ation |
No. of Exh. |
||
| State Ba Versus M/S Ga & other Mr. Deo |
Misc. APPLICATION NO. 24/2024 nk Of India .. Applicant janan Agrotech And Company s .. Defendants kate Mayur G – Advocate for the applicant bank. |
||
| 1. The appli dism CAO |
learned counsel for the applicant has filed this cation for restoration of OA no. 165/2016 which was issed by order dated 31.05.2023 for non-filing of D. |
||
| 2. The acce follo |
reasons given in the Misc. Application are not ptable even then in the interest of justice, I pass the wing order: ORDER |
||
| A. Misc B. Regi 165/ C. Cons on of |
. Application No. 24/2024 is allowed. stry is directed to restore the Original Application no. 2016 to its original stage. ign the file to the Record Room and orders be uploaded ficial web-site. |
||
| (Vimal Gupta) Presiding Officer Debts Recovery Tribunal, Aurangabad |
[APK]
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the application for restoration of the original application be allowed.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
State Bank Of India
M/S Ganjanagrotech And Company
Vimal Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
