DRT, Aurangabad, dismissed a securitisation application (SA No. 331/2023) filed by the applicant against SBI for lack of prosecution as the applicant was not interested in pursuing the matter.
The Securitisation Application No.331/2023 is dismissed for non-prosecution and pending IAs are disposed of accordingly.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL, AURANGABAD
(BEFORE HON’BLE PRESIDING OFFICER, DRT AT AURANGABAD)
ORDER SHEET
22.04.2024
Sr. No.38 SA No.331/2023
SECURITISATION APPLICATION No.331/2023
Sarjerao Rambhau Thorat ..Applicant
Versus
State Bank of India ..Respondent
None for the applicant.
Mr. Arun Rakh – Advocate for the respondent bank.
The matter is taken through Hybrid.
1. None appears for the applicant. Even after pass over
nobody appears for the applicant. It appears that the
applicants are not interested in pursuing the matter.
2. In view of the above, I pass the following order.
ORDER
A. The Securitisation Application No.313/2023 stands
dismissed for non-prosecution.
B. All pending IA in the proceeding if any are disposed of
accordingly.
C. File be consigned to the record room.
(Vimal Gupta)
Presiding Officer
Debts Recovery Tribunal, Aurangabad
ti
Classifi No. of hE
[SBJ]
(SA No.331/2023) Page 1 of 1
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Sarjerao Rambhau Thorat
State Bank of India
Vimal Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
